|
citalopram Celexa Increased responsiveness of presumed 5-HT cells to citalopram in adult rats subjected to prolonged maternal separation relative to brief separation.
Arborelius L, Hawks BW, Owens MJ, Plotsky PM, Nemeroff CB.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. lotta.arborelius fyfa.ki.se
RATIONALE: Certain adverse events in childhood, such as loss of a parent or sexual abuse, are associated with an increased vulnerability to develop depression later in life. Prolonged, daily maternal separation of rat pups induces several behavioral, endocrine and neurochemical changes similar to those observed in human depression. OBJECTIVES: Because dysfunction of brain serotonergic systems has been implicated in the pathophysiology of depression, the effects of neonatal maternal separation on these systems was studied in adult rats. METHODS: Male rat pups were subjected to daily maternal separation for 180 min (HMS180) from postnatal day 2 to day 14. Neonatal handled rats, i.e., pups undergoing daily 15-min separations during the same time period (HMS15), were chosen as a control group, since the 180-min separations involved handling of the pups, i.e., the pups were removed from the home cage during the separations. As adults, the effect of citalopram (0.05-0.80 mg/kg, intravenous) on the firing rate of 5-HT neurons in the dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN) was studied. RESULTS: The inhibitory effect of citalopram on serotonergic cell firing was significantly enhanced at doses of 0.1 mg/kg and 0.4 mg/kg in the HMS180 compared with that in the HMS15 rats. However, the number of binding sites and mRNA expression of the 5-HT transporter and 5-HT(1A) receptors in the DRN did not differ between the two rearing groups. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that early life stress gives rise to persistent changes in the function, but not the density or mRNA expression of central 5-HT(1A) receptors and/or 5-HT transporters.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=15173929&dopt=Abstract citalopram Celexa
citalopram Celexa Effects of citalopram on the excitability of the human motor cortex: a paired magnetic stimulation study.
Robol E, Fiaschi A, Manganotti P.
Dipartimento di Scienze Neurologiche e della Visione, Sezione Neurologia Riabilitativa, Policlinico Giambattista Rossi, Universita di Verona, Via delle Menegone, 10-Verona 37134, Italy. elisarobol interfree.it
Several recent reports suggest the possibility of monitoring pharmacological effects on brain excitability through transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Different drugs have been studied using paired magnetic stimulation in normal subjects and patients. In particular, it has been suggested that antidepressant drugs may have an appreciable effect on motor excitability. The aim of the present study was to investigate motor area excitability in normal subjects after oral administration of a single dose of citalopram, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressant. Motor cortex excitability was studied by single and paired transcranial magnetic stimulation before and 2.5 and 36 (t1/2=36 h) h after oral administration of 30 mg of citalopram. Cortical excitability was measured using different transcranial magnetic stimulation parameters: motor threshold (MT), motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitude and latency, motor recruitment, duration of cortical silent period (CSP), intracortical inhibition and intracortical facilitation. Spinal excitability and peripheral nerve conduction were measured by F response and M wave. Temporary but significant increases in motor threshold, motor-evoked potentials, silent period and intracortical inhibition were observed 2.5 h after drug administration, without any significant changes in motor-evoked potential amplitude and latency and spinal excitability parameters. Our findings suggest that a single oral dose of citalopram can induce significant but transitory suppression of motor cortex excitability in normal subjects.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=15178212&dopt=Abstract citalopram Celexa
citalopram Celexa Antidepressant effects of citalopram and CRF receptor antagonist CP-154,526 in a rat model of depression.
Overstreet DH, Keeney A, Hogg S.
Center for Alcohol Studies, CB #7178, 3009 Thurston-Bowles Building, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7178, USA. dhover med.unc.edu
Due to the interest in the antidepressant potential of nonpeptide corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF)(1) receptor antagonists, the present investigation examined the antidepressant-like effects of the CRF(1) receptor antagonist CP-154,526 on the exaggerated swim test immobility in the Flinders Sensitive Line (FSL) rat, a genetic animal model of depression. Chronic treatment with CP-154,526 (10 mg/kg; 2x day) for 14 days increased swimming in the Flinders Sensitive Line rats. Citalopram (5 and 10 mg/kg; 2x day) and desipramine (5 mg/kg; 1x day) also significantly increased swimming in the Flinders Sensitive Line rats, as expected. However, neither CP-154,526 nor citalopram (10 mg/kg) altered swimming times in the control Flinders Resistant Line (FRL) rats. Citalopram (10 mg/kg) and CP-154,526 also increased the abnormally low level of social interaction behavior in the Flinders Sensitive Line rats. These findings indicate that citalopram and CP154,526, a CRF(1) receptor antagonist, have both antidepressant and anxiolytic effects that can be detected in an experimental model of depression only and not in "normal" control animals.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=15178365&dopt=Abstract citalopram Celexa
citalopram Celexa Four days of citalopram increase suppression of cortisol secretion by prednisolone in healthy volunteers.
Pariante CM, Papadopoulos AS, Poon L, Cleare AJ, Checkley SA, English J, Kerwin RW, Lightman S.
Division of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, 1 Windsor Walk, Denmark Hill, PO 51, London, SE5 8AF, UK. spjucmp iop.kcl.ac.uk
RATIONALE: Chronic antidepressant treatment increases glucocorticoid-mediated negative feedback on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, and thus reduces HPA axis activity, in depressed patients and healthy controls. In contrast, acute antidepressant treatment induces an activation of basal HPA axis activity. OBJECTIVES: We examined the effects of 4 days of treatment with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, citalopram, on basal salivary cortisol and on suppression of salivary cortisol by prednisolone. METHODS: We used a single-blind, placebo-controlled, repeated-measure design. Salivary cortisol was measured from 0900 to 1700 hours. In the first phase of the study, basal salivary cortisol secretion was measured on 2 study days, before and after 4 days of treatment with citalopram (orally, 20 mg/day). In the second phase, salivary cortisol secretion after suppression by prednisolone (5 mg, given at 2200 hours the night before) was measured on 2 study days, again before and after 4 days of treatment with citalopram (orally, 20 mg/day). Eight volunteers participated to the study. RESULTS: Citalopram increased basal salivary cortisol in the morning (0900-1100 hours) by approximately 47% (P=0.003). Moreover, citalopram increased suppression by prednisolone in the morning (0900-1100 hours): suppression was approximately 22% before citalopram and 45% after citalopram (P=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Citalopram increases glucocorticoid-mediated negative feedback on the HPA axis after as little as 4 days of treatment. This effect could be due to an increased function of the corticosteroid receptors. Our findings further support the notion that one of the mechanisms by which antidepressants exert their therapeutic effects is by normalizing HPA axis hyperactivity in depressed patients.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=15179544&dopt=Abstract citalopram Celexa
citalopram Celexa The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor citalopram increases fear after acute treatment but reduces fear with chronic treatment: a comparison with tianeptine.
Burghardt NS, Sullivan GM, McEwen BS, Gorman JM, LeDoux JE.
W.M. Keck Foundation Laboratory of Neurobiology, Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, New York 10003, USA.
BACKGROUND: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are efficacious in the treatment of a variety of fear or anxiety disorders. Although they inhibit the reuptake of serotonin within hours of administration, therapeutic improvement only occurs after several weeks. In this study, we used fear conditioning to begin to understand how acute and chronic SSRI treatment might differentially affect well-characterized fear circuits. METHODS: We evaluated the effects of acute and chronic treatment with the SSRI citalopram on the acquisition of auditory fear conditioning. To further understand the role of serotonin in modulating fear circuits, we compared these effects with those of acute and chronic administration of the antidepressant tianeptine, a purported serotonin reuptake enhancer. RESULTS: We found that acute administration of the SSRI citalopram enhanced acquisition, whereas chronic treatment reduced the acquisition of auditory fear conditioning. In comparison, treatment with tianeptine had no effect acutely but also reduced the acquisition of tone conditioning when administered chronically. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings with citalopram are consistent with the clinical effects of SSRI treatment seen in patients with anxiety disorders, in which anxiety is often increased during early stages of treatment and decreased after several weeks of treatment. The findings also indicate that auditory fear conditioning can be a useful tool in understanding differences in the effects of short-term and long-term antidepressant treatment with serotonergic medications. Copyright 2004 Society of Biological Psychiatry
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=15184036&dopt=Abstract citalopram Celexa
citalopram Celexa Hippocampal brain-derived neurotrophic factor expression following treatment with reboxetine, citalopram, and physical exercise.
Russo-Neustadt AA, Alejandre H, Garcia C, Ivy AS, Chen MJ.
Department of Biological Sciences, California State University, Los Angeles, CA 90032, USA. arusson calstatela.edu
The antidepressants, reboxetine and citalopram, were used in conjunction with voluntary physical exercise (wheel running) in order to assess the contribution of noradrenergic and serotonergic activation to enhancements in hippocampal brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) expression resulting from antidepressant treatment and exercise. Reboxetine (40 mg/kg/day), citalopram (10 mg/kg/day), voluntary physical activity, and the combination of antidepressants with exercise were applied to rats for a range of treatment intervals (2 to 14 days). Hippocampal BDNF transcription levels (full-length BDNF, as well as exons I-IV) were then assessed via in situ hybridization.Reboxetine treatment led to a rapid (evident at 2 days) enhancement in BDNF transcription in several hippocampal regions. This increase was also observed when reboxetine treatment was combined with voluntary physical activity for 2 weeks. Treatment with citalopram led to an increase in BDNF mRNA in only one hippocampal region (CA2) after short-term (2 days) treatment, and when combined with exercise, increased BDNF mRNA in the CA4 and dentate gyrus after 2 weeks. As reported in previous studies, voluntary physical activity enhanced BDNF transcription in several hippocampal areas, both on its own and in combination with antidepressant treatments. Examination of the levels of individual BDNF transcript variants influenced by each of these antidepressants revealed distinct patterns of expression in response to the various treatments, and showed that exercise-plus-antidepressant produced significant changes where antidepressant alone failed. Overall, treatment with the norephinephrine-selective antidepressant, reboxetine, in combination with exercise, led to both rapid and sustained increases in hippocampal BDNF mRNA expression. The serotonergic agent, citalopram, appeared to require longer treatment intervals in order to influence BDNF expression positively.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=15199375&dopt=Abstract citalopram Celexa
citalopram Celexa Cost-effectiveness analysis of escitalopram: a new SSRI in the first-line treatment of major depressive disorder in Austria.
Hemels ME, Kasper S, Walter E, Einarson TR.
International Department of Health Economics and Epidemiology, H. Lundbeck A/S, Paris, France. MEHH Lundbeck.com
OBJECTIVES: To compare the cost-effectiveness of escitalopram, a new selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), with (generic) citalopram in the first-line treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) in Austria. METHODS: A two-path decision analytic model with a 6-month horizon was adapted to the Austrian setting using Austrian clinical guidelines. All patients (aged >or= 18 years) started at the primary successfully treated patient was lower ( currency 115) for care path and were referred to specialist care in the secondary care path in case of insufficient response. Model inputs included drug-specific probabilities from head-to-head trial data, literature and expert opinion. The main outcome measure was success (i.e., remission defined as Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score <or= 12) and costs of treatment (i.e., drug costs and medical care). The analysis was performed from the Austrian societal and Social Healthcare Insurance System (SHIS) perspectives. The Human Capital approach was used to estimate the societal costs of lost productivity. RESULTS: Treatment with escitalopram yielded lower expected cost and greater effectiveness compared with citalopram. The expected success rate was higher for escitalopram (64.5%) compared to citalopram (59.1%). From the SHIS perspective, the total expected cost per escitalopram ( currency 608) compared with citalopram ( currency 723). From the societal perspective, these expected costs were currency 3034 and currency 3269 respectively. Sensitivity analyses on unit costs and probabilities demonstrated the robustness of the results. From the societal perspective, escitalopram remained the dominant treatment option, even at a cost of currency 0 for (generic) citalopram. CONCLUSION: Escitalopram is a cost-effective alternative compared to (generic) citalopram in the first-line treatment of MDD in Austria.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=15200745&dopt=Abstract citalopram Celexa
citalopram Celexa [Content determination of S-citalopram by chiral high-performance liquid chromatography]
[Article in Chinese]
Yang XM, Liu X, Yan YC, Xu JP.
Department of Chemistry, First Military Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China.
OBJECTIVE: To separate the enantiomers of citalopram and determine the content of S-citalopram using chiral high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). METHODS: The chiral column CHIROBIOTIC V was used with the mobile phase using methanol-acetic acid-triethylamine (100:0.1:0.1) at the detection wavelength of 240 nm, column temperature of 20 degrees Celsius and flow rate of 1.0 ml/min. RESULTS: Complete separation of the enantiomers of citalopram was achieved, and S-citalopram exhibited good linearity within the concentration range of 10 to 150 microg/ml (r=0.9991, n=5). CONCLUSION: This method allows accurate quantification of S- and R-citalopram and is well suited for drug interaction investigations.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=15201101&dopt=Abstract citalopram Celexa
Celexa (citalopram) References
Celexa or citalopram 1 |
Celexa or citalopram 2 |
Celexa or citalopram 3 |
Celexa or citalopram 4 |
Celexa or citalopram 5 |
Celexa or citalopram 6 |
Celexa or citalopram 7 |
Celexa or citalopram 8 |
Celexa or citalopram 9 |
Celexa or citalopram 10 |
Celexa or citalopram 11 |
Celexa or citalopram 12 |
Celexa or citalopram 13 |
Celexa or citalopram 14 |
Celexa or citalopram 15 |
Celexa or citalopram 16 |
Celexa or citalopram 17 |
Celexa or citalopram 18 |
Celexa or citalopram 19 |
Celexa or citalopram 20 |
Celexa or citalopram 21 |
Celexa or citalopram 22 |
Celexa or citalopram 23 |
Celexa or citalopram 24 |
Celexa or citalopram 25 |
Celexa or citalopram 26 |
Celexa or citalopram 27 |
Celexa or citalopram 28 |
Celexa or citalopram 29 |
Celexa or citalopram 30 |
Celexa or citalopram 31 |
Celexa or citalopram 32 |
Celexa or citalopram 33 |
Celexa or citalopram 34 |
Celexa or citalopram 35 |
Celexa or citalopram 36 |
Celexa or citalopram 37 |
Celexa or citalopram 38 |
Celexa or citalopram 39 |
Celexa or citalopram 40 |
Celexa or citalopram 41 |
Celexa or citalopram 42 |
Celexa or citalopram 43 |
Celexa or citalopram 44 |
Celexa or citalopram 45 |
Celexa or citalopram 46 |
Celexa or citalopram 47 |
Celexa or citalopram 48 |
Celexa or citalopram 49 |
Celexa or citalopram 50 |
Celexa or citalopram 51 |
Celexa or citalopram 52 |
Celexa or citalopram 53 |
Celexa or citalopram 54
| |