|
citalopram escitalopram Lexapro Serotonin innervation of Lurcher mutant mice: basic data and manipulation with a combination of amantadine, thiamine and L-tryptophan.
Le Marec N, Hebert C, Botez MI, Botez-Marquard T, Marchand L, Reader TA.
Centre for Research in Neurological Sciences, Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, CHUM--Hotel-Dieu Hospital, Quebec, Canada.
The Lurcher (Lc/+) mutant mouse is characterized by a considerable atrophy of the cerebellum due to a massive loss of cerebellar Purkinje and granule cells, as well as of neurons from the inferior olivary nucleus. In this study the effects of a therapeutic combination of amantadine, thiamine and L-tryptophan on the serotonin (5-HT) innervation was assessed in Lurcher mice by autoradiography, using [3H]citalopram to label 5-HT transporters. In wild type mice as well as in both saline-treated and drug-treated Lurcher mutants, [3H]citalopram binding remained unchanged in forebrain and brainstem regions. In the cerebellum, labelling of deep cerebellar nuclei (CBnuc) was about twofold higher than in the cortex (CBctx). In saline-treated Lurcher mutants compared to wild type mice, the densities of [3H]citalopram were 98% higher in CBctx, and 180% higher in CBnuc. In CBctx of drug-treated Lurcher mutants, transporter densities were 89% higher than in the wild type, but did not differ from the saline-treated Lurcher. In the CBnuc of the drug-treated Lurcher mutants, [3H]citalopram binding was 50% higher than in the saline-treated Lurcher group, and 320% higher than in wild type mice. The results show that 5-HT transporters, already upregulated in the CBnuc of Lurcher mutant mice, can be further increased by a pharmacological treatment, possibly altering the availability of 5-HT in some of its target areas.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10230710&dopt=Abstract citalopram escitalopram Lexapro
citalopram escitalopram Lexapro Comparison of the effects of the selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors fluoxetine, paroxetine, citalopram and fluvoxamine in alcohol-preferring cAA rats.
Maurel S, De Vry J, Schreiber R.
CNS Research, Bayer AG, Cologne, Germany.
Clinical studies indicate that selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) may decrease alcohol intake and craving in particular subgroups of alcoholics. The aim of the present study was to compare the behavioral profile of various SSRIs in alcohol-preferring cAA rats, a genetic model of alcoholism. The effects of acute IP administration of fluoxetine (doses in mg/kg 1-10), citalopram (3-30), fluvoxamine (3-30) and paroxetine (1-10) on ethanol (EtOH) intake and preference, as well as food and total fluid intake, were determined in a 12-h access, water vs. 10% v/v EtOH two-bottle choice paradigm. Each compound reduced EtOH intake [Minimal Effective Doses (MEDs) 5, 10, 30 and 1 mg/kg for fluoxetine, citalopram, fluvoxamine, and paroxetine, respectively]. The degree of selectivity, that is, the extent to which reductions in EtOH intake could be separated from reductions in food and/or total fluid intake varied across the compounds. Thus, whereas EtOH intake was more markedly affected than food intake by fluoxetine, both parameters were equally affected by citalopram, and food intake was more markedly affected than EtOH intake by fluvoxamine and paroxetine. The anti-alcohol effect also differed with respect to specificity, that is, the degree to which effects on EtOH intake coincided with effects on EtOH preference. Whereas fluoxetine showed the highest level of specificity, followed by citalopram and fluvoxamine, the effect of paroxetine was nonspecific. The observed variation in the degree of selectivity and specificity of the anti-alcohol effect of SSRIs suggests that reductions in EtOH intake are not merely a consequence of a general suppressive effect on consummatory behavior. It is hypothesized that differences between the behavioral profiles of these compounds reflect a differential involvement of 5-HT receptor subtypes.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10231167&dopt=Abstract citalopram escitalopram Lexapro
citalopram escitalopram Lexapro Acute and long-term treatments with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor citalopram modulate the HPA axis activity at different levels in male rats.
Jensen JB, Jessop DS, Harbuz MS, Mork A, Sanchez C, Mikkelsen JD.
Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark. jej lundbeck.com
It is well established that the maximal therapeutic effect of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) are achieved in depressive patients after several weeks of treatment, but the adaptive processes leading to the therapeutic effects are unclear. It has been shown that hyperactivity in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis in depressive patients is affected by long-term antidepressant treatment. These changes occur in association with the mood normalising effect, suggesting that antidepressants affect the HPA axis and this effect is associated with the therapeutic effect. Male Wistar rats were treated with the SSRI, citalopram, to investigate time-related changes in components that may be involved in the desensitization of the HPA axis. A single injection of citalopram (10 mg/kg, s.c.), increased the plasma levels of ACTH and corticosterone in a dose-dependent manner and increased the number of c-Fos containing cells in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus. A daily treatment with the same compound (10 mg/kg, s.c.) for 14 days decreased the expression of POMC mRNA ( approximately 40%). In addition, a blunted response to citalopram was observed in animals long-term treated with citalopram. Also CRF-stimulated cAMP accumulation in the pituitary was altered. In conclusion, acute citalopram activated the HPA-axis at the hypothalamic level and long-term citalopram treatment desensitized the HPA-axis at the pituitary level. These results support the hypothesis that the therapeutic effects of long-term antidepressant treatments reduce HPA axis responsiveness.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10336728&dopt=Abstract citalopram escitalopram Lexapro
citalopram escitalopram Lexapro Altered open-field behavior in experimental chronic hepatic encephalopathy after single venlafaxine and citalopram challenges.
Apelqvist G, Wikell C, Hindfelt B, Bergqvist PB, Andersson G, Bengtsson F.
Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Lund University Hospital, Sweden.
RATIONALE: Latent or manifest chronic hepatic encephalopathy (HE) symptomatology often includes affective symptoms. It is therefore warranted to investigate the functional outcome of novel antidepressants when chronic HE prevails. OBJECTIVE: Portacaval shunt (PCS) in rats is a widely used experimental model for chronic HE, a neuropsychiatric syndrome accompanying liver dysfunction. HE is believed to arise from a primary alteration in neurotransmission in the CNS. PCS has been reported to increase the metabolism of serotonin in the brain, and thus the central serotonin nerve of PCS rats may contain more serotonin than normal. However, the functional relevance of this serotonergic alteration in terms of affecting behavioral performance of PCS rats has been only rarely studied. METHODS: Locomotor and rearing activities were recorded in PCS and sham-operated control rats. A single subcutaneous challenge with saline versus either the mixed serotonin/noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor venlafaxine (10 mg x kg(-1)) or the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor citalopram (5 mg x kg(-1)) were performed. RESULTS: The PCS-saline injected rats showed reduced locomotor and rearing activity compared with sham-saline treated rats. While no significant differences could be observed following the venlafaxine challenge to controls, the PCS-venlafaxine challenged rats displayed reduced behavioral activity as compared to PCS-saline treated rats. The PCS-citalopram rats, however, displayed increased activity compared with the PCS-saline rats while, again, no effect of the citalopram challenge to controls was found. CONCLUSIONS: The present study show altered but opposite behavior in PCS rats, when challenged with either venlafaxine or citalopram, compared to PCS control rats. These findings therefore support the contention that caution should be advocated when CNS monoamine active drugs are used in liver-impaired subjects until better delineation of the combined pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic outcome for each such drug in this condition has been made.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10367559&dopt=Abstract citalopram escitalopram Lexapro
citalopram escitalopram Lexapro Transport mechanisms for the antidepressant citalopram in brain microvessel endothelium.
Rochat B, Baumann P, Audus KL.
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Kansas, 2095 Constant Avenue, Lawrence, KS 66047, USA.
Blood-brain barrier transport of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor and antidepressant, citalopram, was studied using monolayers of bovine brain microvessel endothelial cells (BMECs). This study provides for the first time, evidence of a transport mechanism for a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI). Carrier-mediated transport, efflux mechanisms, as well as inhibition of metabolizing enzymes of citalopram were investigated. Citalopram transport was saturable and temperature-dependent suggesting that passage of the drug across BMECs was mediated by a carrier mechanism. Since the apical to basolateral and basolateral to apical permeability coefficients were similar and cyclosporin A, a P-glycoprotein inhibitor, does not modify the transport of citalopram, it appeared that no active efflux systems were involved in this transport. Citalopram is only available as a racemic drug and its pharmacological effect resides mainly in the S-(+)-enantiomer. However, the passage of citalopram enantiomers across BMEC monolayers was not stereoselective. Finally, inhibition of the metabolizing enzymes of citalopram and monoamine oxidases did not modify the permeation of citalopram across BMECs. Collectively, our results suggested that citalopram crosses the blood-brain barrier via a non-stereoselective, bidirectional and symmetrical carrier-mediated mechanism without influences of active efflux mechanisms or monoamine oxidases. Copyright 1999 Elsevier Science B. V.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10412001&dopt=Abstract citalopram escitalopram Lexapro
citalopram escitalopram Lexapro Autoreceptors remain functional after prolonged treatment with a serotonin reuptake inhibitor.
Hjorth S, Auerbach SB.
Department of Pharmacology, University of Goteborg, Goteborg, Sweden.
Serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) autoreceptors may desensitize during prolonged administration of antidepressant drugs. If autoreceptors desensitize, their inhibitory influence on extracellular 5-HT should be attenuated. To test this hypothesis, the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) citalopram (10 mg kg(-1), s.c., b.i.d.) or saline was administered for 14 days to rats. After a 24-h washout period, rats were anesthetized, and implanted with dialysis probes for determination of 5-HT in the frontal cortex (FCx) and dorsal hippocampus (DH). In response to citalopram (5 mg kg(-1), s.c.) challenge, there were moderate increases in 5-HT in the FCx and DH of both the chronic citalopram and saline pretreatment groups. After subsequent administration of the 5-HT(1A/1B) autoreceptor antagonist, (-)-penbutolol, there were further increases in 5-HT in the FCx and DH of the saline pretreatment group. Moreover, contrary to the expected effect if autoreceptors were desensitized, the potentiation produced by (-)-penbutolol was greater in the FCx and DH of the chronic citalopram group as compared to rats pretreated with saline. These results suggest that autoreceptors still restrain the increase in 5-HT produced by an SSRI after prolonged administration. Copyright 1999 Elsevier Science B.V.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10415377&dopt=Abstract citalopram escitalopram Lexapro
citalopram escitalopram Lexapro [Citalopram in forensic samples. Citalopram concentrations in samples from legal autopsies and from living persons in connection with traffic accidents or cases of violence in Denmark 1989-1996]
[Article in Danish]
Worm K, Dragsholt C, Simonsen KW, Kringsholm B.
Retskemisk afdeling, Kobenhavns Universitet.
Citalopram was found in 92 autopsy cases and 27 cases from living persons and the concentrations are described. A range of 6.2-19 mumol/kg whole blood was found in cases where citalopram alone was the cause of death and a range of 1.9-16 mumol/kg whole blood in cases, where citalopram together with other compounds were considered to be the cause of death. In autopsy cases toxic concentrations were in the range 1.2-2.8 mumol/kg whole blood and concentrations between 0:09 and 1.9 mumol/kg were considered therapeutic. In cases from living persons the citalopram concentrations in whole blood were 0.06-0.9 mumol/kg.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10439690&dopt=Abstract citalopram escitalopram Lexapro
Lexapro (escitalopram) References
Lexapro or escitalopram 1 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 2 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 3 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 4 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 5 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 6 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 7 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 8 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 9 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 10 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 11 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 12 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 13 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 14 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 15 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 16 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 17 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 18 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 19 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 20 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 21 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 22 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 23 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 24 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 25 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 26 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 27 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 28 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 29 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 30 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 31 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 32 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 33 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 34 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 35 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 36 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 37 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 38 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 39 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 40 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 41 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 42 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 43 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 44 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 45 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 46 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 47 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 48 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 49 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 50 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 51 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 52 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 53 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 54 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 55 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 56 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 57 |
Lexapro or escitalopram 58
| |