buy Protopic




Arthritis
Genital Warts
Osteoporosis
Parasites




Protopic
Systemic toxicity of tacrolimus given by various routes and the response to dose reduction.

Akar Y, Yucel G, Durukan A, Yucel I, Arici G.

Department of Ophthalmology, Akdeniz University Medical Faculty Antalya, Turkey. yakar akdeniz.edu.tr

PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term systemic toxicity of tacrolimus (FK-506) administered by various routes, and to assess the effect of dose reduction on toxicity. METHODS: The study animals were 120 experimentally naive adult female Wistar rats weighing 200-250 g each. The rats were randomly divided into 10 equal groups (n=12 in each) and treated with tacrolimus administered topically (in drops, 0.3%, q.i.d.), intravitreally (0.5 mg/kg bodyweight/week), intramuscularly (1 mg/kg bodyweight/week), low-dose intravenously (1 mg/kg bodyweight/week) and in high-dose intravenously (2 mg/kg bodyweight/week) for 3 months. The rats in the control groups (one for each different route of administration) were treated with 0.9% NaCl. The blood concentration of tacrolimus, complete blood count and biochemistry parameters were measured each month for the 3-month study period. RESULTS: The rats in the control groups and experimental groups administered topical and intravitreal tacrolimus did not demonstrate any systemic toxic effects. The rats that developed certain toxic effects (hyperglycaemia, hyperkalaemia and nephrotoxicity) in the groups given low-dose or high-dose i.v. tacrolimus responded well to dose reduction. Following dose reduction, blood glucose concentrations decreased from 247.4 +/- 42.3 mg/dL to 189.6 +/- 37.9 mg/dL (P <0.05), and from 237.4 +/- 41.1 mg/dL to 182.3 +/- 22.7 mg/dL (P <0.05) in the low- and high-dose i.v. tacrolimus-treated rats, respectively. The rats that developed impaired hepatic function after high-dose tacrolimus did not respond to dose reduction. Baseline cholesterol concentrations for the intramuscular and low- and high-dose i.v. tacrolimus-treated groups, demonstrated decreases, respectively, from 87.4 +/- 14.0 mg/dL, 86.4 +/- 14.0 mg/dL and 90.4 +/- 14.3 mg/dL to 53.6 +/- 9.8 mg/dL, 52.1 +/- 12.5 mg/dL and 63.5 +/- 11.7 mg/dL by the end of the second month. The differences were found to be statistically significant (P <0.05 for each result). CONCLUSION: Topical or intravitreal administration of tacrolimus seems to be systemically safe whereas parenteral administration can cause some systemic haematological changes such as dose-dependent decreased serum cholesterol concentrations. Dose reduction may prevent such adverse effects.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=15670079&dopt=Abstract tacrolimus Protopic



Protopic
Transient up-regulation of P-glycoprotein reduces tacrolimus absorption after ischemia-reperfusion injury in rat ileum.

Omae T, Goto M, Shimomura M, Masuda S, Ito K, Okuda M, Inui K.

Department of Pharmacy, Kyoto University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.

Ischemia-reperfusion injury is an unavoidable problem for organ transplantation including small bowel transplantation, and causes a large intra-individual variation of tacrolimus (FK506) pharmacokinetics. Little information is available about the regulation of the intestinal P-glycoprotein expression during tissue regeneration. In the present study, we have examined the molecular and functional variations of ileum P-glycoprotein using rats after ischemia-reperfusion treatment. Morphological study revealed a rapid regeneration of the intestinal wall during 24 h after reperfusion. A reverse transcription-coupled competitive PCR and Western blot analysis revealed that the intestinal expression of P-glycoprotein recovered with time after reperfusion. At 24 h after reperfusion, the ileum P-glycoprotein level was transiently increased to two-fold, and the absorption rate of dihydro-[(3)H]FK506 from in situ ileum loop into portal vein was markedly low in comparison with the control. P-glycoprotein was detected in the crypt area as well as in villous cells at 6 h after reperfusion, and then localized to the apical surface at 24 h consistent with the cell proliferation and differentiation. However, the P-glycoprotein level returned to normal at 48 h. The intra-individual variation in the absorptive rate of tacrolimus was suggested to be regulated by the morphological status of the intestinal epithelium and enterocyte expression level of P-glycoprotein. Therefore, the monitoring of the enterocyte P-glycoprotein level would provide useful information for determining the dosage of tacrolimus immediately after small bowl transplantation.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=15670575&dopt=Abstract tacrolimus Protopic



Protopic
Hepatic clearance improves after angioplasty of the hepatic vein.

Narumi S, Hakamada K, Toyoki Y, Totsuka E, Niioka T, Umehara Y, Ono H, Nishimura A, Yoshihara S, Sasaki M.

Department of Surgery, Hirosaki University School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.

Anastomotic stricture sometimes causes hepatic congestion leading to decreased hepatic clearance of drugs. We herein describe a correlation between trough levels of tacrolimus and an anastomotic stricture of the hepatic vein. A 13-year-old boy underwent living donor liver transplant with a left lobe graft from his mother. Outflow blockage due to an anastomotic stricture of the hepatic vein developed 3 months after transplant. His anastomotic site had been repeatedly treated with percutaneous transvenous angioplasty (PTA) by balloon dilation. About 1 year after transplant, his trough level of tacrolimus promptly decreased after balloon dilation (from 15.7 to 5.6 ng/dL). Liver function tests showed abnormalities, which were diagnosed as acute cellular rejection, and he was treated with pulse steroid therapy. The calculated half-life of tacrolimus (T1/2) showed marked improvement after PTA (from 35 to 22 hours). A 45-year-old woman underwent living donor transplantation due to alcoholic liver cirrhosis with a left lobe graft from her brother. An anastomotic stricture of the hepatic vein developed 4 months after transplant. She was treated with balloon dilation, which caused an abrupt decrease in the trough level of tacrolimus (12 to 4 ng/dL). Her alkaline phosphatase was elevated and she was diagnosed with rejection, which was treated with an increase of dosage of tacrolimus. In outflow block, the T1/2 of tacrolimus increases probably due to decreased hepatic clearance by stagnation or congestion of the liver. However, hepatic clearance of drugs quickly recovers after PTA. Close monitoring of immunosuppressive agents is fundamental at the time of angioplasty to avoid acute cellular rejection as developed in our two cases.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=15686702&dopt=Abstract tacrolimus Protopic



Protopic
Corticosteroid weaning in the tacrolimus and mycophenolate era in heart transplantation: clinical and neurohormonal benefits.

Mehra MR, Uber PA, Park MH, Ventura HO, Scott RL.

Cardiomyopathy and Heart Transplantation Center Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, Louisiana 70121, USA. mmehra ochsner.org

BACKGROUND: Compared with cyclosporine, tacrolimus-based immunosuppression yields improved metabolic outcomes in heart transplantation. Whether corticosteroid freedom provides incremental metabolic benefits in tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil immunoprophylaxis remains uncertain. METHODS: In a prospective trial, 41 heart transplant patients treated with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil underwent steroid weaning immediately after transplantation until weaning was complete. Weaning was interrupted only for treated rejection with or without hemodynamic compromise. Benefits of steroid weaning assessed following the first year included B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), late infections, lipids, blood pressure, hyperglycemia, and body mass index (BMI). RESULTS: Of this 41 patient cohort (age 53 +/- 9 years, 50% black American, 35% women) followed for a total of 47 +/- 5 months, 25 had corticosteroids discontinued (62%) by an average of 20 +/- 11 months. No differences between the two groups were noted in baseline characteristics. Significant predictors of failure to wean steroids included higher rejection, BNP, and lower dose of mycophenolate mofetil. No significant benefits of steroid weaning were noted on lipids, blood pressure, hyperglycemia, and BMI. However, late infections (after 1 year) requiring hospitalizations were more frequent in the failure to wean group (0.60.4 vs 0 infections/patient/y, P <.001). INFERENCES: Unlike known metabolic benefits of steroid withdrawal with cyclosporine, heart transplant recipients treated with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil demonstrate no incremental metabolic benefits, but instead experience benefits of decreased serious late infections. Furthermore, failure to discontinue corticosteroids in this series is predicted by early allograft rejection, use of lower doses of mycophenolate mofetil, and higher BNP levels suggesting poor cardiac adaptation.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=15686716&dopt=Abstract tacrolimus Protopic



Protopic
Conversion to cyclosporine provides valuable rescue therapy for living donor adult liver transplant patients intolerant to tacrolimus: A single-center experience at the University of Tokyo.

Tamura S, Sugawara Y, Kishi Y, Akamatsu N, Kaneko J, Murai N, Makuuchi M.

Artificial Organ and Transplantation Division, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Tacrolimus-based immunosuppression is currently accepted as mainstream therapy in many transplant centers worldwide due to its potent immunosuppressive activity compared to cyclosporine. A tacrolimus-based regimen has been successfully used for our living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) recipients. Adverse effects such as neurotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, and new-onset diabetes mellitus, however, have limited its clinical application. In deceased donor liver transplantation, cyclosporine rescue therapy is valuable for such complications, but few reports have described a strategy for conversion in LDLT. Herein, we present our experience of conversion from tacrolimus to cyclosporine therapy in adult LDLT recipients. Among 203 recipients, 37 patients (18%) required conversion, primarily for neurotoxicity (41%), diabetes mellitus (16%), hematopoietic disorder (16%), and gastrointestinal intolerance (11%). Primary adverse events resolved within 2 months after conversion in 35/37 (94%) of the patients. For LDLT recipients unable to maintain effective immunosuppression with tacrolimus, conversion to cyclosporine is an effective option.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=15686738&dopt=Abstract tacrolimus Protopic



Protopic
Corticosteroid-free immunosuppression with tacrolimus following induction with daclizumab: a large randomized clinical study.

Boillot O, Mayer DA, Boudjema K, Salizzoni M, Gridelli B, Filipponi F, Trunecka P, Krawczyk M, Clavien PA, Ducerf C, Margarit C, Margreiter R, Pallardo JM, Hoeckerstedt K, Pageaux GP.

Service de Transplantation, Hopital Edouard Herriot, Place D'Arsonval, 69437 Lyon Cedex 03, France. boillot cismsun.univ-lyon1.fr

This open, randomized (1 : 1), multicenter, 3-month study compared a dual tacrolimus plus steroids (Tac / steroids) regimen with a steroid-free immunosuppressive regimen of tacrolimus following daclizumab induction therapy (Tac / Dac) in adult liver transplant recipients. The full analysis set comprised 347 patients in the Tac / steroids group and 351 in the Tac / Dac group. Mean tacrolimus dose during month 3 was 0.11 mg/kg/day in both groups; mean whole-blood trough levels during month 3 were 10.9 ng/mL (Tac / steroids) and 10.6 ng/mL (Tac / Dac). The incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection that required treatment was similar in both groups: 26.5% in the Tac / steroids group and 25.4% in the Tac / Dac group (P = .727). However, the incidence of biopsy-confirmed corticosteroid-resistant acute rejection was higher in the Tac / steroids group than in the Tac / Dac group (6.3 vs. 2.8%; P = .027). Kaplan-Meier estimates of graft survival (92.2 vs. 90.5%) and patient survival (94.5 vs. 93.7%) were similar in both groups. While also the overall adverse event profiles were similar, the incidences of diabetes mellitus (15.3 vs. 5.7%, respectively; P < .001) and cytomegalovirus infection (11.5 vs. 5.1%, respectively; P = .002) were higher in the Tac / steroids group compared with the Tac / Dac group. Mean cholesterol levels increased by 16% in the Tac / steroids group, but were unchanged in the Tac / Dac group during the study. In conclusion, tacrolimus monotherapy following daclizumab induction is an effective and safe regimen, with an advantage over concomitant steroid-maintenance therapy in terms of a lower incidence of diabetes and viral infection, and a lower incidence of steroid-resistant acute rejection.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=15690537&dopt=Abstract tacrolimus Protopic



Protopic
Steroid withdrawal at 3 months after kidney transplantation: a comparison of two tacrolimus-based regimens.

Wlodarczyk Z, Walaszewski J, Perner F, Vitko S, Ostrowski M, Bachleda P, Kokot F, Klinger M, Szenohradszky P, Studenik P, Navratil P, Asztalos L, Rutkowski B, Kalmar KN, Hickey D.

Department of Transplantology, Szpital Wojewodzki, Poznan, Poland. zwlodar yahoo.co.uk

The 6 month prospective, randomized study compared the steroid-sparing potential of two tacrolimus-based regimens after renal transplantation. A total of 489 patients were randomized (1:1) to receive tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/steroids (n = 243; group Tac/MMF/S) or tacrolimus/azathioprine/steroids (n = 246; group Tac/Aza/S). At 3 months, steroids were tapered off in 267 (54.6%) patients free from steroid-resistant acute rejection and with serum creatinine concentrations <160 micromol/l. The incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection at month 3 was lower in group Tac/MMF/S compared with group Tac/Aza/S (18.1% vs. 26.0%,P = 0.035). Moreover, more patients in the Tac/MMF/S group met the criteria for steroid withdrawal than in the Tac/Aza/S group (60.5% vs. 48.8%; P < 0.01). The incidence of acute rejection during months 4-6 was low in all groups, both for patients on steroid-free dual therapy (Tac/MMF: 2.7%, Tac/Aza: 0.8%) and for patients who continued steroid maintenance therapy (Tac/MMF/S: 3.5%, Tac/Aza/S: 7.1%). Moreover, kidney function was well preserved in steroid-free patients with month 6 median serum creatinine levels of 119.5 micromol/l (Tac/MMF), and 115.1 micromol/l (Tac/Aza). For patients who continued to receive steroids, month 6 median creatinine levels were 130.5 micromol/l (Tac/MMF/S) and 132.8 micromol/l (Tac/Aza/S). The criteria for the selection of patients to discontinue steroids were adequate. Both tacrolimus-based regimens allowed the safe discontinuation of steroids in low-risk patients at month 3. The Tac/MMF combination was superior in the prevention of acute rejections and more patients met the chosen criteria for steroid withdrawal.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=15691267&dopt=Abstract tacrolimus Protopic









Protopic (tacrolimus) References

Protopic or tacrolimus 1 | Protopic or tacrolimus 2 | Protopic or tacrolimus 3 | Protopic or tacrolimus 4 | Protopic or tacrolimus 5 | Protopic or tacrolimus 6 | Protopic or tacrolimus 7 | Protopic or tacrolimus 8 | Protopic or tacrolimus 9 | Protopic or tacrolimus 10 | Protopic or tacrolimus 11 | Protopic or tacrolimus 12 | Protopic or tacrolimus 13 | Protopic or tacrolimus 14 | Protopic or tacrolimus 15 | Protopic or tacrolimus 16 | Protopic or tacrolimus 17 | Protopic or tacrolimus 18 | Protopic or tacrolimus 19 | Protopic or tacrolimus 20 | Protopic or tacrolimus 21 | Protopic or tacrolimus 22 | Protopic or tacrolimus 23 | Protopic or tacrolimus 24 | Protopic or tacrolimus 25 | Protopic or tacrolimus 26 | Protopic or tacrolimus 27 | Protopic or tacrolimus 28 | Protopic or tacrolimus 29 | Protopic or tacrolimus 30 | Protopic or tacrolimus 31 | Protopic or tacrolimus 32 | Protopic or tacrolimus 33 | Protopic or tacrolimus 34 | Protopic or tacrolimus 35 | Protopic or tacrolimus 36 | Protopic or tacrolimus 37 | Protopic or tacrolimus 38 | Protopic or tacrolimus 39 | Protopic or tacrolimus 40 | Protopic or tacrolimus 41 | Protopic or tacrolimus 42 | Protopic or tacrolimus 43 | Protopic or tacrolimus 44 | Protopic or tacrolimus 45 | Protopic or tacrolimus 46 | Protopic or tacrolimus 47 | Protopic or tacrolimus 48 | Protopic or tacrolimus 49 | Protopic or tacrolimus 50 | Protopic or tacrolimus 51



© DreamPharm.com