|
Protopic Oxidative stress in kidney transplant patients with calcineurin inhibitor-induced hypertension: effect of ramipril.
Calo LA, Davis PA, Giacon B, Pagnin E, Sartori M, Riegler P, Antonello A, Huber W, Semplicini A.
Department of Clinical and Exprimental Medicine, Clinica Medica 4, University of Padova, Padova, Italy. renzcalo unipd.it
In patients with cyclosporine-induced hypertension, upregulation of the nitric oxide system and oxidative stress were shown, which could induce hypertension, remodeling, and chronic rejection by increasing nitric oxide catabolism. However, it is still debated whether cyclosporine and tacrolimus exert a different action. The aim of the current study was to compare the effects of cyclosporine and tacrolimus on markers of oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction in kidney transplant patients with posttransplant hypertension. Monocyte p22, a NADH/NADPH system subunit, transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta), heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), and endothelial NOS gene expression were measured in 16 patients. Angiotensin II is a potent stimulator of oxidative stress and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition may blunt this effect. Therefore, the same parameters were measured before and after 2 months of treatment with ramipril (5 mg/d). At baseline, in cyclosporine-and tacrolimus-treated patients, p22 and TGF-beta mRNA were similarly increased in comparison with normotensive healthy controls (0.90 +/- 0.05 d.u. and 0.83 +/- 0.05 in cyclosporine, 0.89 +/- 0.07 and 0.84 +/- 0.05 in tacrolimus; 0.53 +/- 0.07 and 0.75 +/- 0.03 in controls, respectively; p < 0.001). Endothelial NOS mRNA was increased in cyclosporine-and tacrolimus-treated patients in comparison with controls (0.92 +/- 0.09, 0.96 +/- 0.04, and 0.37 +/- 0.05 respectively; p < 0.001), whereas no difference was found between patients and controls in HO-1 mRNA. Ramipril reduced blood pressure (from 140 +/- 11/91 +/- 7 mm Hg to 129 +/- 6/85 +/- 5 mm Hg in cyclosporine and from 138 +/- 7/92 +/- 7 mm Hg to 127 +/- 10/82 +/- 6 mm Hg in tacrolimus group; p < 0.02 with no difference between groups). Ramipril also reduced p22 (to 0.83 +/- 0.05 in cyclosporine, p < 0.03 and to 0.81 +/- 0.08 in tacrolimus; p < 0.01) and TGF-beta mRNA (to 0.72 +/- 01 in cyclosporine, p < 0.02, and to 0.73 +/- 0.05 in tacrolimus; p < 0.01) with no difference between groups, but it did not change HO-1 and ecNOS mRNA. Cyclosporine and tacrolimus induce a comparable oxidative stress in kidney transplant patients with posttransplant hypertension. The association of ramipril normalizes blood pressure and reduces the oxidative stress induced by both drugs.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12352326&dopt=Abstract tacrolimus Protopic
Protopic Neurotoxicity induced by tacrolimus after liver transplantation: relation to genetic polymorphisms of the ABCB1 (MDR1) gene.
Yamauchi A, Ieiri I, Kataoka Y, Tanabe M, Nishizaki T, Oishi R, Higuchi S, Otsubo K, Sugimachi K.
Department of Pharmaceutical Care and Health Sciences, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan.
BACKGROUND: Tacrolimus is a substrate of P-glycoprotein (PGP) encoded by the multidrug resistant (MDR)1 gene (ABCB1). PGP, a multidrug efflux pump, restricts the distribution of tacrolimus in the brain. In this study, we investigate the correlation of ABCB1 gene polymorphism with tacrolimus-induced neurotoxicity in patients after liver transplantation. METHODS: The genotype of 6 patients with neurotoxic events and 11 patients without neurotoxic events was analyzed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and 8 mutations were detected. In addition to laboratory findings and patient characteristics, the contribution of mutations in the ABCB1 gene was evaluated with stepwise discriminant function analysis. RESULTS: High tacrolimus concentration, liver dysfunction, and mutation at position 2677 in exon 21 were demonstrated as positive predictors of tacrolimus-induced neurotoxicity. CONCLUSION: It is indicated that blood concentrations, liver function, graft weight, and polymorphism in the ABCB1 gene are important factors in tacrolimus-induced neurotoxicity.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12352921&dopt=Abstract tacrolimus Protopic
Protopic Comparison of an ELISA and an LC/MS/MS method for measuring tacrolimus concentrations and making dosage decisions in transplant recipients.
Staatz CE, Taylor PJ, Tett SE.
School of Phamacy, University of Queensland, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Queensland, Australia. c.staatz pharmacy.uq.edu.au
This study compared an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) technique for measurement of tacrolimus concentrations in adult kidney and liver transplant recipients, and investigated how assay choice influenced pharmacokinetic parameter estimates and drug dosage decisions. Tacrolimus concentrations measured by both ELISA and LC/MS/MS from 29 kidney (n = 98 samples) and 27 liver (n = 97 samples) transplant recipients were used to evaluate the performance of these methods in the clinical setting. Tacrolimus concentrations measured by the two techniques were compared via regression analysis. Population pharmacokinetic models were developed independently using ELISA and LC/MS/MS data from 76 kidney recipients. Derived kinetic parameters were used to formulate "typical dosing" regimens for concentration targeting. Dosage recommendations for the two assays were compared. The relation between LC/MS/MS and ELISA measurements was best described by the regression equation ELISA = 1.02. (LC/MS/MS) + 0.14 in kidney recipients, and ELISA = 1.12. (LC/MS/MS) - 0.87 in liver recipients. ELISA displayed less accuracy than LC/MS/MS at lower tacrolimus concentrations. Population pharmacokinetic models based on ELISA and LC/MS/MS data were similar with residual random errors of 4.1 ng/mL and 3.7 ng/mL, respectively. Assay choice gave rise to dosage prediction differences ranging from 0% to 30%. ELISA measurements of tacrolimus are not automatically interchangeable with LC/MS/MS values. Assay differences were greatest in adult liver recipients, probably reflecting periods of liver dysfunction and impaired biliary secretion of metabolites. While the majority of data collected in this study suggested assay differences in adult kidney recipients were minimal, findings of ELISA dosage underpredictions of up to 25% in the long term must be investigated further.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12352932&dopt=Abstract tacrolimus Protopic
Protopic A combined treatment with tacrolimus (FK506) and recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for thrombotic focal cerebral ischemia in rats: increased neuroprotective efficacy and extended therapeutic time window.
Maeda M, Furuichi Y, Ueyama N, Moriguchi A, Satoh N, Matsuoka N, Goto T, Yanagihara T.
Medicinal Biology Research Laboratories, Fujisawa Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Kashima, Osaka, Japan.
The authors evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of tacrolimus (FK506), administered alone or in combination with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA), on brain infarction following thrombotic middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion. Thrombotic occlusion of the MCA was induced by a photochemical reaction between rose bengal and green light in Sprague-Dawley rats, and the volume of ischemic brain damage was determined 24 hours later. Intravenous administration of tacrolimus or t-PA dose-dependently reduced the volume of ischemic brain infarction, whether administered immediately or 1 hour after MCA occlusion. When tacrolimus or t-PA was administered 2 hours after MCA occlusion, each drug showed a tendency to reduce ischemic brain damage. However, combined treatment with both drugs resulted in a significant reduction in ischemic brain damage. On administration 3 hours after MCA occlusion, tacrolimus alone showed no effect, and t-PA tended to worsen ischemic brain damage. However, the combined treatment with both drugs not only ameliorated the worsening trend seen with t-PA alone, but also tended to reduce ischemic brain damage. In conclusion, tacrolimus, used in combination with t-PA, augmented therapeutic efficacy on brain damage associated with focal ischemia and extended the therapeutic time window compared to single-drug treatments.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12368659&dopt=Abstract tacrolimus Protopic
Protopic [Effect of cyclosporin and tacrolimus on lipoprotein oxidation after renal transplantation]
[Article in Spanish]
Martinez Castelao A, Ramos R, Seron D, Gil-Vernet S, Fiol C, Gomez-Gerique N, Yzaguirre MT, Hurtado I, Sabate I, Alsina J, Grinyo JM.
Servicio de Nefrologia, Unitat Recerca Experimental, Hospital Principes de Espana, CSUB. amcastel terra.es
BACKGROUND: Cyclosporin A is a lipogenic immunosuppressor that can induce posttransplant hyperlipidaemia. Oxidation of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) has been recognized as a major atherogenic factor. Tacrolimus seems to be less lipogenic with an apparently better cardiovascular profile than CsA. METHODS: We have studied the lipidic profile and the oxidation of HDL and LDL in 20 renal transplant patients, 12 male and 8 female, mean age 45 +/- 10 year, who where switched from CsA to tacrolimus due to CsA adverse effects. LDL were determined by ultracentrifugation. Oxidation study before and 6 months after conversion to tacrolimus was performed by adding CuSO4. RESULTS: After conversion, systolic blood pressure (BP) decreased from 154 +/- 21 to 133 +/- 21 mm Hg (p = 0.008), diastolic BP from 97 +/- 13 to 77 +/- 15 mm Hg (p = 0.016), total cholesterol from 6.08 +/- 0.9 to 5.68 +/- 1.1 mmol/l (p = 0.02), LDL-chol from 3.29 +/- 1.01 to 2.96 +/- 0.3 mmol/l (p = 0.04) and apo-B lipoprotein from 1.42 +/- 0.28 to 1.15 +/- 0.34 mg/dl (p = 0.003). The oxidation of LDL improved after conversion: the initial dienic compounds decreased from 95 +/- 20 to 63 +/- 12 umol/g and the final DC from 207 +/- 56 to 107 +/- 35 umol/g. Lag-phase increased from 33 +/- 21 to 45 +/- 17 min (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Tacrolimus has improved hyperlipidaemia in our cyclosporin previously treated patients and increased the resistance to oxidation of high and low-density lipoproteins.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12369128&dopt=Abstract tacrolimus Protopic
Protopic MDR1 haplotypes derived from exons 21 and 26 do not affect the steady-state pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in renal transplant patients.
Mai I, Perloff ES, Bauer S, Goldammer M, Johne A, Filler G, Budde K, Roots I.
Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Charite-University Medicine Berlin, Germany. ingrid.mai charite.de
AIM: This retrospective study investigated the influence of MDR1 haplotypes derived from the polymorphisms 2677G > T (exon 21) and 3435C > T (exon 26) on the pharmacokinetics of the immunosuppressant drug tacrolimus in 73 renal transplant patients. METHODS: Based on both variants of SNPs 2677 and 3435, four different haplotypes and eight different genotypes were identified in the study sample. Tacrolimus trough concentrations (C(0)) were compared between different SNP variants and genotypes, as well as between carriers and noncarriers of each haplotype. Additionally, CYP3A5 genotype (6956G > A) was determined. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed between groups. Differences in mean tacrolimus C(0) values between carriers and noncarriers of each haplotype ranged from -0.04 microg/litre (95% confidence interval: -0.53 to 0.60) to -23 microg/litre (-1.07 to 1.53). No association was found between CYP3A5*1/*3 genotype and tacrolimus Co concentractions. CONCLUSION: MDR1 haplotypes derived from the SNPs 2677G > T (exon 21) and 3435C > T (exon 26) do not influence the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in renal transplant patients.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=15521904&dopt=Abstract tacrolimus Protopic
Protopic Combined effects of calcineurin inhibitors or sirolimus with anti-CD40L mAb on alloengraftment under nonmyeloablative conditions.
Taylor PA, Lees CJ, Wilson JM, Ehrhardt MJ, Campbell MT, Noelle RJ, Blazar BR.
University of Minnesota Cancer Center, Division of Bone Marrow Transplantation, 420 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
The immunosuppressive drugs, cyclosporine A (CsA), tacrolimus, or sirolimus, were analyzed as single agents and in combination with anti-CD40L monoclonal antibody (mAb) for their effects on alloengraftment in mice conditioned with minimal total body irradiation (TBI). Whereas anti-CD40L mAb facilitated chimerism, neither sirolimus nor CsA resulted in substantial alloengraftment. However, sirolimus was synergistic with anti-CD40L mAb for inducing donor chimerism. Contrary to expectations, CsA, a T-cell receptor (TCR) signaling inhibitor, did not abrogate anti-CD40L mAb-facilitated engraftment but rather increased engraftment in anti-CD40L mAb-treated mice. Although tacrolimus alone or with anti-CD40L mAb resulted in similar levels of donor chimerism, donor T-cell reconstitution was very low in tacrolimus-treated mice. At 1 week after transplantation, CsA decreased thymic numbers more profoundly than sirolimus or tacrolimus in anti-CD40L mAb-treated recipients. In contrast, only sirolimus resulted in a decrease in host splenic T-cell numbers in anti-CD40L mAb-treated recipients. Importantly, sirolimus and anti-CD40L mAb induced profound donor tolerance with 100% acceptance of donor skin grafts placed early after bone marrow transplantation (BMT). In contrast, anti-CD40L mAb alone or in combination with CsA resulted in 12% or less donor skin graft acceptance early (1 month) and 60% or less later (3 months) after BMT. These data have clinical relevance and indicate that immunosuppressive pharmacologic agents enhance anti-CD40L mAb-facilitated alloengraftment and tolerance induction under nonmyeloablative conditioning.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12384443&dopt=Abstract tacrolimus Protopic
Protopic (tacrolimus) References
Protopic or tacrolimus 1 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 2 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 3 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 4 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 5 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 6 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 7 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 8 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 9 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 10 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 11 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 12 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 13 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 14 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 15 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 16 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 17 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 18 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 19 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 20 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 21 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 22 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 23 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 24 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 25 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 26 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 27 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 28 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 29 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 30 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 31 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 32 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 33 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 34 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 35 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 36 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 37 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 38 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 39 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 40 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 41 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 42 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 43 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 44 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 45 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 46 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 47 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 48 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 49 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 50 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 51
| |