buy Singulair




Arthritis
Genital Warts
Osteoporosis
Parasites





The effect of treatment with montelukast on in vitro interleukin-10 production of mononuclear cells of children with asthma.

Kuna P.

Department of Pediatrics and Allergy, The M Curie Hospital, Zgierz, Poland. interna wss.zgierz.pl

BACKGROUND: The effects of leukotriene modifiers on IL-10 production have not been studied in children with asthma. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to determine the changes in IL-10 concentrations, clinical efficacy and peripheral blood eosinophil counts after treatment with montelukast. METHODS: The study was conducted on 27 patients: 13 patients monoallergic to grass pollen during the pollen season (GPs group) and out of the pollen season (GPos group), and on 14 patients monoallergic to house dust mite (HDM) from May to September (HDM group). Main outcome measures were changes in concentrations of IL-10 in the supernatant after a 4-week treatment with montelukast. Measurements of asthma severity score, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and peripheral blood eosinophil counts were the secondary end-points. RESULTS: Montelukast resulted in a within-group significant increase in IL-10 concentration in the supernatant in the GPs (54.0 vs. 125.5 pg/mL) and in the HDM (51.2 vs. 77.1 pg/mL) group. Montelukast had no effect on changes of IL-10 concentration in the supernatant from peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) culture after non-sensitizing allergen stimulation. Montelukast significantly improved asthma control and FEV1, and significantly decreased eosinophil blood count in the GPs and in the HDM group after a 4-week treatment. Montelukast did not lead to changes of all measured parameters within the GPos group. CONCLUSION: Montelukast increased IL-10 concentration in supernatants from sensitizing allergen-stimulated PBMC culture obtained from children with asthma monoallergic to grass pollen during the pollen season, and from children with asthma monoallergic to HDM.

Online pharmacy ref source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=15725194&dopt=Abstract montelukast, Singulair




Outcomes associated with initiation of different controller therapies in a Medicaid asthmatic population: a retrospective data analysis.

Schechter MS.

Ohio State University College of Pharmacy and School of Public Health, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA. Balkrishnan.1 osu.edu

BACKGROUND: Outcomes in asthmatic patients may vary depending on the controller medication used. Observational studies of outcomes of asthma therapy are needed to understand the implications of choice of controller in different populations. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether there are differences in health care use and costs of asthma treatment in asthma patients treated with montelukast compared with fluticasone proponiate 44 microg. METHOD: Using data from the North Carolina Medicaid program, we compared continuously enrolled asthmatic patients starting either fluticasone propionate 44 microg (FP44), an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) (n = 312), or montelukast 5 and 10 mg, an oral leukotriene modifier (LM) (n = 398) between the years 1998 and 1999. A secondary analysis compared continuously enrolled asthmatic patients already using ICS as controller therapy initiating either salmeterol (long-acting beta-agonist) (n = 97) or montelukast (n = 101) in the year 1998. Patients were followed for 1 year pre- and postcontroller or additional controller initiation for health care service use, medication refill patterns, and costs. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the adjusted asthma-related health care costs between the montelukast and FP44 groups. In both groups, physician visits were significantly higher in year 2 (p < 0.01) than in year 1. We found montelukast users to be more adherent with prescription refills (using measures of medication possession) even after allowing for a wider adherence range for FP (RR = 2.53; 95% CI = 1.50-4.26), although patients using montelukast were more likely than patients with fluticasone to switch controller pharmacotherapy (RR = 1.53; 95% CI = 1.12-2.09). Similarly, there were no differences in health care service use and costs between the montelukast and salmeterol groups, with the exception of a 33% reduction (p < 0.01) in number of inhaled corticosteroid refills in the second year in the salmeterol group. CONCLUSION: There were no cost and major health care use differences between the two primary or secondary controller therapies in the postinitiation year. Although FP was associated with lower rate of controller switch, montelukast use was associated with significantly better treatment adherence in patients with treatment persistence in this population of Medicaid-enrolled asthmatic patients. The addition of salmeterol as additional controller was associated with a significant decrease in inhaled corticosteroid use, suggesting decreased adherence in patients on the two-drug regimen.

Online pharmacy ref source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=15801326&dopt=Abstract montelukast, Singulair




[Preventive effects of montelukast on the collagen expression of pulmonary arterioles in rats with chronic hypoxia]

[Article in Chinese]

Xia XQ.

Department of Respiratory Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the preventive effects of montelukast on the collagen expression of pulmonary arterioles in chronic hypoxic rats. METHODS: Thirty male Wistar rats were randomly divided into three groups: control group, hypoxic group and montelukast preventive group. The animal model of pulmonary hypertension was established by exposing the rats to normabaric hypoxic conditions 8 hours q.d. for 3 weeks. The expression levels of collagen I and III in arterioles were observed by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: The positive degree of collagen I in pulmonary arterioles of hypoxic group was higher than that of control group (1.51+/-0.09 vs 1.15+/-0.05, P<0.01), and the positive degree of collagen I in pulmonary arterioles of preventive group (1.19+/-0.06) was lower than that of hypoxic group (P<0.01). The differences of positive degree of collagen III in pulmonary arterioles were not significant among the three groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Montelukast can reduce the hypoxia-induced deposition of collagen I in the pulmonary arterioles wall.

Online pharmacy ref source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=15807270&dopt=Abstract montelukast, Singulair




Salmeterol/fluticasone propionate versus fluticasone propionate plus montelukast: a cost-effective comparison for asthma.

Sondhi S.

Elkerliek Ziekenhuis, Helmond, The Netherlands. wpieters elkerliek.nl

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Asthma, owing to its chronic nature, is associated with a substantial economic burden. Healthcare providers need to compare the cost effectiveness of alternative asthma treatment options to ensure that they obtain the best value for money from the resources they control. The objective of the current study was to compare the cost effectiveness of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate in combination with fluticasone propionate plus montelukast in patients with symptomatic asthma uncontrolled with inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) monotherapy. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Direct healthcare resource data were prospectively collected during a double-blind, randomized, 12-week clinical study of inhaled salmeterol/fluticasone propionate 50/100 microg twice daily (n = 356) and inhaled fluticasone propionate 100 microg twice daily plus oral montelukast 10mg daily (n = 369). Resources were costed in Dutch guilders (NLG) from the perspective of The Netherlands healthcare system using 1999/2000 prices, but have been presented in US dollars and euros. The primary effectiveness measure was the proportion of successfully treated weeks (based on mean morning PEF values). Secondary measures were episode-free days, symptom-free days, and symptom-free nights. RESULTS: Salmeterol/fluticasone propionate was more effective than fluticasone propionate plus montelukast as measured by the proportion of successfully treated weeks mean 63.3% vs 39.0%; median difference 25%; p < 0.001). Salmeterol/fluticasone propionate was also more effective than fluticasone propionate plus montelukast according to the secondary effectiveness measures. The mean total direct daily healthcare costs per patient were 16% higher with fluticasone propionate plus montelukast than with salmeterol/fluticasone propionate mainly due to higher drug costs in the former group (2.25 US dollars vs 1.94; 1.92 euro vs 1.66, respectively; the NLG was fixed against the euro at a rate of 1 euro = NLG2.2 on 31 December 1998; 1 US dollars = NLG1.883, June 2003; 1 US dollars= 0.848 euro, June 2003). Incremental cost-effectiveness analyses showed that salmeterol/fluticasone propionate was dominant over fluticasone propionate plus montelukast and sensitivity analyses showed these results to be robust. CONCLUSION: Salmeterol/fluticasone propionate is a more cost-effective treatment option than fluticasone propionate plus montelukast for patients with symptomatic asthma uncontrolled by ICS.

Online pharmacy ref source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=15813665&dopt=Abstract montelukast, Singulair




[Increasing diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis in Spain]

[Article in Spanish]

Varea Calderon V.

Seccion de Gastroenterologia, Hepatologia y Nutricion Pediatrica, Hospital Sant Joan de Deu, Barcelona, Espana. javiermartin hsjdbcn.org

INTRODUCTION: Eosinophilic esophagitis is a chronic inflammation of the esophagus characterized by marked eosinophilic infiltration. It is frequently associated with other allergic diseases. In the last few years, the incidence of eosinophilic infiltration has shown a striking increase in Spain, partly due to better knowledge of the disease and to the correct diagnosis of patients previously thought to be suffering from gastroesophageal reflux. MATERIAL AND METHODS: To report our experience in the diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis in the last few years and compare our data with previously published findings and current knowledge of the subject. RESULTS: From January 1997 to November 2003, 11 patients (nine boys and two girls) were diagnosed with eosinophilic esophagitis. The mean age at diagnosis was 9 years and 7 months. The most frequent symptoms were dysphagia with solids and food impaction. Seven patients had a familial history of allergy. Allergic tests were positive in eight patients; five had food allergy, five were positive for aeroallergens and two patients had mixed allergy. Endoscopy showed esophageal trachealization in two patients and papular whitish exudate in a further two; both these findings are characteristic of eosinophilic esophagitis. Endoscopic appearance was normal in seven patients. Esophageal biopsies showed > 20 eosinophils/hpf. Five patients had eosinophilic infiltration in other parts of the digestive tract. All the patients with food allergy were put on exclusion diets. Three patients received systemic steroids and cromolyn sodium and three received montelukast, with good response in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of eosinophilic esophagitis is increasing. This disease should be considered in patients with longstanding symptoms presumed to be caused by gastroesophageal reflux or motility disorders with poor response to standard therapy. Eosinophilic esophagitis is frequently associated with allergy. A normal appearance of esophageal mucosa on endoscopy should not prevent the clinician from taking multiple biopsies. Patients with eosinophilic esophagitis show good response to anti-allergic treatment.

Online pharmacy ref source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=15826562&dopt=Abstract montelukast, Singulair









Singulair (montelukast) online references

Singulair or montelukast 1 | Singulair or montelukast 2 | Singulair or montelukast 3 | Singulair or montelukast 4 | Singulair or montelukast 5 | Singulair or montelukast 6 | Singulair or montelukast 7 | Singulair or montelukast 8 | Singulair or montelukast 9 | Singulair or montelukast 10 | Singulair or montelukast 11 | Singulair or montelukast 12 | Singulair or montelukast 13 | Singulair or montelukast 14 | Singulair or montelukast 15 | Singulair or montelukast 16 | Singulair or montelukast 17 | Singulair or montelukast 18 | Singulair or montelukast 19 | Singulair or montelukast 20 | Singulair or montelukast 21 | Singulair or montelukast 22 | Singulair or montelukast 23 | Singulair or montelukast 24 | Singulair or montelukast 25 | Singulair or montelukast 26 | Singulair or montelukast 27 | Singulair or montelukast 28 | Singulair or montelukast 29 | Singulair or montelukast 30 | Singulair or montelukast 31 | Singulair or montelukast 32 | Singulair or montelukast 33 | Singulair or montelukast 34 | Singulair or montelukast 35 | Singulair or montelukast 36



© DreamPharm.com