|
Weight loss Lipid peroxides in obese patients and effects of weight loss with orlistat on lipid peroxides levels.
Yesilbursa D, Serdar Z, Serdar A, Sarac M, Coskun S, Jale C.
Cardiology Department, Uludag University Medical School, Bursa, Turkey. dilekyb uludag.edu.tr
OBJECTIVE: Obesity is a well-known risk factor of atherosclerosis. Recent studies showed that obesity is associated with enhanced lipid peroxidation. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of weight reduction with orlistat treatment on lipid peroxidation levels. We assessed lipid peroxidation by measuring the concentration of plasma malondialdehyde (MDA). DESIGN: A randomized, controlled, open-label 6-month study. SUBJECTS: In total, 36 obese (body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m2) and 11 healthy age-matched control subjects were enrolled in the study. MEASUREMENTS: Fasting glucose, triglyceride, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol and LDL cholesterol and MDA levels were measured in both groups. Obese subjects received orlistat, 120 mg three times daily together with hypocaloric diet. After 6 months of treatment laboratory tests were repeated. RESULTS: MDA levels were significantly higher in obese patients than the control group (P<0.0001). After 6 months of treatment in obese subjects, the mean weight of the patients decreased by 6.8 kg, the BMI by 3.2 kg/m2. Plasma MDA levels were significantly reduced by weight loss from 2+/-0.77 to 0.89+/-0.41 nmol/ml (P<0.001). BMI correlated with MDA levels at baseline (r=0.6, P<0.0001). Changes in BMI was positively associated with plasma MDA level reduction (r=0.36, P<0.05). CONCLUSION: These results indicate that obesity is associated with increases in endogenous lipid peroxides. Our data show that the indicator of lipid peroxidation-MDA-falls markedly in association with weight loss with orlistat. The demonstration of decreased free radical generation has important implications for oxidative mechanism underlying obesity-associated disorders.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=15467775&dopt=Abstract weight loss
Weight loss Comparison of efficacy of sibutramine or orlistat versus their combination in obese women.
Sari R, Balci MK, Cakir M, Altunbas H, Karayalcin U.
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, School of Medicine, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey. drsari hotmail.com
OBJECTIVE: Sibutramine and orlistat are currently used for weight loss. We aimed to investigate the effect of orlistat and sibutramine combination therapy in treatment of obese women. SUBJECTS AND DESIGN: Study population consisted of 89 obese women who had a body mass index > or = 30 kg/m2, were normotensive, and had normal glucose tolerance. All patients were placed on a diet which contained fat approximately 30% of total calorie intake and the diet was designed to cause an energy deficit of approximately 2.51-3.56 megajoule/day. At the first month of diet (baseline), all patients were randomly divided into three therapy groups: Diet + Orlistat (group 1; n = 30 patients), Diet + Sibutramine (group 2; n = 29 patients), Diet + Orlistat + Sibutramine (group 3; n = 30 patients). Body weight, body fat distribution and serum lipid levels were evaluated baseline and after six months in all subjects. RESULTS: Mean weight loss was 5.5 +/- 4.9 kg (p = 0.024) in group 1, 10.1 +/- 3.6 kg (p < 0.001) in group 2, 10.8 +/- 6.6 kg (p < 0.001) in group 3 after the six months. Weight loss was significantly greater in group 2 (p = 0.003) and group 3 (p = 0.002) when compared with group 1. Percentage of mean weight loss was 5.5 +/- 3.1% in group 1, 10.2 +/- 4.8% in group 2, 10.6 +/- 5.7% in group 3. Percentage of weight loss was higher in group 2 (p = 0.01) and group 3 (p = 0.009) when compared with group 1. Weight loss and percentage of weight loss were not different between group 2 and group 3. CONCLUSION: These three regimens had different results on weight loss in obese women. Combination drug therapy and sibutramine therapy were both more effective than orlistat therapy alone. However, no significant difference was noted between combination drug therapy and sibutramine treatment groups.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=15473126&dopt=Abstract weight loss
Weight loss Human exposure to endocrine disrupters: consequences of gastroplasty on plasma concentration of toxic pollutants.
Charlier C, Desaive C, Plomteux G.
Clinical Toxicology Laboratory, University Hospital, Liege, Belgium. c.charlier chu.ulg.ac.be
BACKGROUND: Body weight loss occurring after a hypoenergetic diet or a gastroplasty could be followed by an increase in blood concentration of potentially toxic pollutants that can interfere with the hormonal system (endocrine disrupters). DESIGN: Thirty obese individuals recruited for gastroplasty were compared before and after treatment with 45 normal-weight people. MEASUREMENTS: Blood samples were analyzed for DDT, DDE, HCB and PCBs no. 28, 52, 101, 118, 138, 153 and 180, by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. RESULTS: The results indicate clearly that body weight loss occurring after gastroplasty increases plasma concentration of lipophilic pollutants. CONCLUSION: Gastroplasty increases plasma concentration of organochlorine pesticides and PCBs, which could be a risk factor of endocrine disruption. Future longitudinal research will have to determine if the advantages of body weight loss are reduced by this potentially harmful effect.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12439648&dopt=Abstract weight loss
Weight loss Weight change and the risk of gestational diabetes in obese women.
Glazer NL, Hendrickson AF, Schellenbaum GD, Mueller BA.
University of Washington, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Department of Epidemiology, Seattle, Washington, USA.
BACKGROUND: Obesity is an established risk factor for gestational diabetes. It is not known whether this risk might be reduced through weight loss between pregnancies. We sought to determine whether weight loss between pregnancies reduced the risk of gestational diabetes among obese women. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study of 4102 women with 2 or more singleton live births in Washington State between 1992 and 1998. All subjects were nondiabetic and obese (at least 200 lbs) at their first birth during these years. Weight change was calculated as the difference between prepregnancy weight for the 2 pregnancies. We estimated relative risks of gestational diabetes at the subsequent delivery through stratified analyses and Mantel-Haenszel estimates. RESULTS: Thirty-two percent of women lost weight between pregnancies, with a mean weight loss of 23 lbs. Women who lost at least 10 lbs between pregnancies had a decreased risk of gestational diabetes relative to women whose weight changed by less than 10 lbs (relative risk = 0.63; 95% confidence interval = 0.38-1.02, adjusted for age and weight gain during each pregnancy). Of the 61% of women who gained weight between pregnancies, the mean weight gain was 22 lbs. Women who gained at least 10 lbs had an increased risk of gestational diabetes (1.47; 1.05-2.04). CONCLUSIONS: Even moderate changes in prepregnancy weight can apparently affect the risk of gestational diabetes among obese women. This may offer further motivation for interventions aimed at reducing obesity among women of reproductive age.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=15475723&dopt=Abstract weight loss
Weight loss Long-term follow-up of gastric stimulation for obesity: the Mestre 8-year experience.
Cigaina V.
Surgical Department, Umberto 1st Public Hospital, Mestre, Venezia, Italy. VCigaina Transneuronix.com
BACKGROUND: 10 years experience with gastric stimulation demonstrates promise, in particular because weight loss is achieved and maintained without drugs or side-effects. We report on a total of 65 patients who have received an Implantable Gastric Stimulator (IGS(R)) since 1995. METHODS: 65 patients have received an IGS and were monitored for weight loss as well as co-morbidities. Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) was assessed by endoscopy and symptoms were evaluated. An acute Holter study was performed on 4 patients pre-implant, post-implant, and post-activation of the IGS. Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) using a 76-g bolus of oral dextrose was done before device implantation and after-activation. Gastric emptying was tested on 19 of the patients using Tc99, both pre-implant and 6 months post-implant. Resting Energy Expenditure (REE) was studied in 15 patients using indirect calorimetry at 3 different points in time: pre-activation, 6 months post-implant, and 12 months post-implant. Blood pressure was measured using an electronic wrist device to overcome potential artifacts due to arm fat. RESULTS: IGS patients lost significant weight with no side-effects and experienced significant and rapid improvements in blood pressure. Almost all of the GERD patients reported symptomatic relief during gastric pacing. OGTT demonstrated improved response to insulin at 7 months post-stimulation. The gastric emptying and REE tests were less conclusive, to a great extent because of the small sub-population of patients. CONCLUSION: While the exact mechanisms of gastric stimulation remain incompletely understood, it appears that the implantation of an IGS is associated with weight loss, an improvement (decrease) in blood pressure in hypertensive patients, and a reduction or elimination of symptoms in those who had GERD. This promising weight loss therapy warrants further study, in particular because of its intriguing results with co-morbidities.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=15479585&dopt=Abstract weight loss
Weight loss "What are the yanks doing?" the U.S. experience with implantable gastric stimulation (IGS) for the treatment of obesity - update on the ongoing clinical trials.
Shikora SA.
Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA. sshikora tufts-nemc.org
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of obesity is growing worldwide. Medical therapies are often ineffective, and surgical treatments have significant risk. IGS(R) offers a novel approach to weight loss that was found to be safe and effective in European trials. In the U.S., 2 consecutive trials have been undertaken. METHODS: In 2000, a multicenter, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial involving 103 morbidly obese patients (U.S. O-01) was undertaken. In 2002, a prospective, open label trial involving 30 morbidly obese patients was initiated (DIGEST). Patients were followed for complications, postoperative untoward events, and weight loss. RESULTS: In O-01, there were no significant perioperative complications. However, 20 patients were found to have had lead dislodgements. At 7 months, there was no significant difference in weight loss between the activated and non-activated groups. After 29 months, loss of excess weight (EWL) approached 20%. With DIGEST, there was 1 operative complication (a lost needle retrieved surgically). There were no untoward events or known lead dislodgements. EWL was 23% after only 16 months follow-up. With the introduction of a preoperative screening algorithm, almost 40% EWL was achieved for selected patients in both trials. CONCLUSIONS: In the U.S., the IGS system for the treatment of obesity has been shown to be safe. Technical improvements and better patient selection resulted in improved weight loss. The preliminary results of these trials suggest that IGS may be a suitable surgical option for selected patients.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=15479589&dopt=Abstract weight loss
Weight loss Glycemic control in diabetic patients after bariatric surgery.
Diniz Mde F, Diniz MT, Sanches SR, de Almeida Salgado PP, Valadao MM, Freitas CP, Vieira DJ.
Servico de Endocrinologia e Metabologia, Hospital das Clinicas da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil. mfhsdiniz ufmg.br
BACKGROUND: Morbid obesity is associated with a high prevalence of diabetes mellitus, and weight loss is fundamental to improve glycemic control. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of weight reduction during the late postoperative period (> or = 12 months) after gastric bypass on the glycemic control of diabetic patients. METHODS: Fasting glycemia (glucose oxidase) and glycohemoglobin A1c (enzymatic fluorescence, reference value: 4-6%) were determined before and after surgery. Results were compared by the Student t-test for paired samples (P <0.05). RESULTS: 23 women and 8 men with diabetes, with a mean follow-up of 27.2 months and a mean age of 42.5 years (30-68), were studied. Before surgery, mean +/- SD weight, BMI, excess weight, glycemia and glycohemoglobin were 135.9+/-11.6 kg, 51.8+/-6.4 kg/m2, 68.3+/-14.5 kg, 173+/-71.2 mg/dl, and 7.4+/-1.9%, respectively. After surgery, mean weight, BMI, excess weight, percent weight loss, percent excess weight loss, glycemia and glycohemoglobin were 89.7+/-8.8 kg, 35+/-4.5 kg/m2, 24.6+/-11.6 kg, 32.6%+/-1.8 (12.6-46.5%), 64.7+/-18.3%, 98+/-17.3 mg/dl (P <0.01), and 5.4+/-1.0% (P <0.05), respectively. Oral anti-diabetic drug and/or insulin treatment was discontinued in 89.2% of the patients. After surgery, 90.3% of the patients maintained glycohemoglobin A1c levels <7.0%. CONCLUSION: Weight loss led to a significant and sustained improvement of glycemic control in these patients submitted to bariatric surgery.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=15479592&dopt=Abstract weight loss
Weight loss Calorie intake and meal patterns up to 4 years after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery.
Warde-Kamar J, Rogers M, Flancbaum L, Laferrere B.
Obesity Research Center, St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center, New York, NY 10025, USA.
BACKGROUND: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) is the most popular surgical treatment for morbid obesity in the U.S.A., producing significant and durable weight loss with improvement in co-morbidities. Although a greater number of patients are undergoing surgical treatment for obesity, little data are available regarding their food intake after surgery. This study was undertaken to evaluate the caloric amount, nutrient composition and meal patterns of patients 18 months to 4 years after RYGBP. Ethnic differences in food intake were also investigated. METHODS: Questionnaires were mailed to 360 patients who had undergone RYGBP at least 18 months prior to the onset of the study. RESULTS: Data were available from 69 patients, 52% Caucasian, 25% African-American, 23% Hispanic. 30 months after surgery, the average daily calorie intake was 1733 +/- 630 kcal (n=68, range 624-3486 kcal), with 44% of calories from carbohydrates, 22% from protein and 33% from fat. Sugar-sweetened beverages represented 7% of total caloric intake. Patients consumed 3 meals and 3 snacks per day on average. Food intake from dinner and an evening snack represented 40% of the daily caloric intake. Snacks accounted for 37% of the daily intake. Percent excess weight loss (%EWL) was 58 +/- 17% and was not different among ethnic groups. However, Hispanics reported consuming fewer snacks and fewer calories. %EWL correlated with the total daily caloric intake (r= .446, P <0.001). Follow-up attendance was 54% at 1 year after surgery but fell to 10% at 3 years. Only 77% of patients were taking vitamin supplements. CONCLUSION: RYGBP resulted in significant weight loss. Caloric intake was quite variable. Long-term follow-up remained low, putting patients at risk for metabolic and vitamin deficiencies. The relationship between caloric intake and long-term weight changes remains to be studied.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=15479596&dopt=Abstract weight loss
Weight loss Body contouring following massive weight loss.
Taylor J, Shermak M.
The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Division of Plastic Surgery, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.
BACKGROUND: Obesity and its associated medical morbidities carry substantial health risk. While massive weight loss allows improvement in health status and lifestyle, physical sequelae due to symptomatic skin redundancy still require treatment. Areas affected include the arms, breasts, abdomen, back, and thighs. After open gastric bypass, patients often have poor abdominal support and incisional hernias. To completely address the treatment of patients following massive weight loss, body contouring procedures are performed, often in one stage and tailored to each patient, to rid the functional and esthetic impairment from skin redundancy. METHODS: This retrospective study includes 30 patients treated from March 1998 to August 2002 by a single surgeon at an academic hospital. Average weight loss had been 71 kg, and average weight and BMI at the time of contouring surgery were 98.6 kg and 33 kg/m2 respectively. Procedures included abdominal panniculectomy, thighlift, backlift, brachioplasty, mastopexy and incisional hernia repair, performed either alone or in combination. RESULTS: Average weight of resected tissue was 5.9 kg. Average length of stay was 3 days. Complications included seroma, wound breakdown, hematoma requiring surgical drainage, and lymphocele after brachioplasty. One patient died of a pulmonary embolus within weeks after surgery. CONCLUSION: Patients requiring surgical skin excision after massive weight loss for functional and/or esthetic reasons are challenging, and require individualized approaches with intensive follow-up.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=15479597&dopt=Abstract weight loss
Weight loss: online references
weight loss 1 |
weight loss 2 |
weight loss 3 |
weight loss 4 |
weight loss 5 |
weight loss 6 |
weight loss 7 |
weight loss 8 |
weight loss 9 |
weight loss 10 |
weight loss 11 |
weight loss 12 |
weight loss 13 |
weight loss 14 |
weight loss 15 |
weight loss 16 |
weight loss 17 |
weight loss 18 |
weight loss 19 |
weight loss 20 |
weight loss 21 |
weight loss 22 |
weight loss 23 |
weight loss 24 |
weight loss 25 |
weight loss 26 |
weight loss 27 |
weight loss 28 |
weight loss 29 |
weight loss 30 |
weight loss 31 |
weight loss 32 |
weight loss 33 |
weight loss 34 |
weight loss 35 |
weight loss 36 |
weight loss 37 |
weight loss 38 |
weight loss 39 |
weight loss 40 |
weight loss 41 |
weight loss 42 |
weight loss 43 |
weight loss 44 |
weight loss 45 |
weight loss 46 |
weight loss 47 |
weight loss 48 |
weight loss 49 |
weight loss 50 |
weight loss 51 |
weight loss 52 |
weight loss 53 |
weight loss 54 |
weight loss 55 |
weight loss 56 |
weight loss 57 |
weight loss 58 |
weight loss 59 |
weight loss 60 |
weight loss 61 |
weight loss 62 |
weight loss 63 |
weight loss 64 |
weight loss 65 |
weight loss 66 |
weight loss 67 |
weight loss 68 |
weight loss 69 |
weight loss 70 |
weight loss 71 |
weight loss 72 |
weight loss 73 |
weight loss 74 |
weight loss 75 |
weight loss 76 |
weight loss 77 |
weight loss 78 |
weight loss 79 |
weight loss 80 |
weight loss 81 |
weight loss 82 |
weight loss 83 |
weight loss 84 |
weight loss 85 |
weight loss 86 |
weight loss 87 |
weight loss 88 |
weight loss 89
| |